Why The Athletic sees Kentucky basketball as March Madness upset bait, again

Kentucky has been a magnet for big first round losses in recent years, as both Saint Peter's and Oakland pulled off shockers. One news outlet believes the Cats are poised to be upset one more time. Find out who and why inside.
NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament - First Round - Pittsburgh
NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament - First Round - Pittsburgh | Tim Nwachukwu/GettyImages

March Madness is a wild, unpredictable beast, and every year it seems to feast on a blue-blood program or two. According to The Athletic, the Kentucky Wildcats are perched atop the list of teams most likely to get bounced in the first round of the 2025 NCAA Tournament. That’s right—Kentucky, the winningest program in college basketball history, is staring down the barrel of another potential early exit. Alongside Wisconsin, Michigan, Oregon, and Ole Miss, the Wildcats were flagged as vulnerable giants, but Kentucky’s spot at the head of the pack has Big Blue Nation on edge with a mix of dread and defiance. So, what’s the deal? Why are the experts pointing at Mark Pope’s squad as the prime candidate for an upset? Let’s break it down with a little hoopla and a lot of hoops insight.

The Athletic’s Jordan Brenner and Peter Keating didn’t mince words: massive upsets in college basketball often aren’t about the Cinderella squad pulling off a miracle—they’re about the top dog tripping over its own paws. And Kentucky, despite a solid season under first-year coach Mark Pope, has some glaring quirks that could turn a Thursday night in March into a nightmare. The stats tell a story that’s equal parts fascinating and frustrating, and it all starts with how the Wildcats handle—or don’t handle—the ball.

First up, Kentucky ranks dead last in the country in steal percentage. Yep, 351st out of 351 Division I teams. That’s not just bad—it’s historically atrocious. Steals are the spark plugs of extra possessions, those chaotic moments that flip games on their heads. But the Wildcats? They’re letting opponents dribble around like it’s an open gym session. This isn’t just a quirky stat—it’s a red flag waving in the wind. In March, when every possession is a lifeline, failing to force turnovers is like handing the underdog a free pass to hang around. And we all know what happens when a scrappy 14-seed gets comfortable, but we wont' mention their name in March in Kentucky.

Then there’s the 3-point conundrum. Kentucky’s defense has a habit of letting teams chuck it from downtown—way too often for comfort. The Athletic pointed out that this laissez-faire approach to perimeter defense is a shaky strategy in the tournament, where hot-shooting underdogs can turn a game into a highlight reel overnight. Remember Oakland’s Jack Gohlke last year? The guy sank 10 triples to send John Calipari’s Cats packing in the first round. Kentucky’s current roster isn’t exactly repeating that script, but they’re not slamming the door on sharpshooters either. In a one-and-done setting, all it takes is one guy to catch fire, and suddenly the Wildcats are on the wrong end of a buzzer-beater montage.

On the flip side, Kentucky’s offense is a juggernaut—sixth in the nation, per The Athletic’s Slingshot model. Pope’s system is a thing of beauty when it’s humming: crisp ball movement, open looks, and a barrage of 3s that can bury teams. But here’s the kicker: they don’t crash the offensive glass. At all. Among the country’s elite offenses, that’s their Achilles’ heel. When the shots aren’t falling—and in March, they won’t always—you need second chances to stay alive. Kentucky’s lack of offensive rebounding leaves them exposed, with no safety net for a cold shooting night. And in the tournament, where variance reigns supreme, that’s a recipe for disaster.

Now, let’s not bury Pope just yet. His debut season in Lexington has been a breath of fresh air after years of postseason flops under Calipari. The guy took a roster with zero returning scholarship players and turned it into a legit contender, racking up Quad 1 wins like they’re going out of style. 11 of them, to be exact—tied for 4th most in the country, and the same amount of Quad 1 games Duke has played total. Kentucky’s beaten top-five teams, hung tough in a brutal SEC, and played a style that’s fun to watch. Pope’s got the Wildcats trending up, no question. But is it wrong to warn that this success could crash-land in the first round if the wrong matchup comes calling, especially with recent history? Remember Mark Pope has never won a game in the NCAA tournament.

Say Kentucky draws a feisty mid-major with a couple of guards who can’t miss from deep. The Wildcats don’t force turnovers, the 3s start raining, and their own offense sputters without those extra possessions. Before you know it, Rupp Arena’s rafters are safe for another year, and Pope’s honeymoon with the fanbase hits its first real turbulence. It’s not tough to see it unfolding—Kentucky’s been here before, the ghosts of first-round disappointments linger in Lexington like a bad memory.

But here’s the fun part: March Madness thrives on chaos, and Kentucky’s flaws don’t guarantee doom. If they lock in defensively, tighten up on the perimeter, and keep that offense rolling, they could steamroll their way to the second weekend and beyond. Pope’s a smart coach—he’s not blind to these weaknesses. The question is whether he can patch them up in time or if the tournament’s randomness catches him off guard with all the injuries.

So, Big Blue Nation, buckle up. The Athletic has Kentucky pegged as the upset darling of 2025, and the numbers back it up—low steal percentage, porous 3-point defense, and a reliance on first-shot efficiency. Mark Pope’s first year has been a triumph, no doubt, but the specter of another early exit looms large. Will the Wildcats defy the odds and dance deep into March, or will they add another chapter to their growing book of first-round flops? One thing’s for sure: when Kentucky tips off in the tournament, every eye in college basketball will be watching, waiting to see if the glass slipper fits someone else—again.