The NCAA's new transfer window is a good start, but it's not enough

The new window cleans up the calendar, but it doesn't clean up the culture of college football's free agency problem.
Texas Tech v Florida
Texas Tech v Florida | Mitchell Layton/GettyImages

The wild west of college football's roster management may have just gotten a new sheriff. The NCAA announced this week it is moving to a single offseason Transfer P{ortal window, eliminating the chaotic 10-day spring period that has frustrated coaches in recent years. While this move is a logical and necessary step towards sanity in college football, it feels more like a bandage than a cure for what truly ails the sport.

Let’s be clear: player freedom, the ability to profit from name, image, and likeness, and the opportunity to transfer are all positive. But the current system, with its lack of guardrails, has morphed into unchecked free agency, and it's threatening the competitive balance of the sport. Whoever can splash the most cash with collectives can get whatever player they want, see Texas Tech.

A step in the right direction

Mark Stoops
Toledo v Kentucky | Michael Hickey/GettyImages

First, the good. Eliminating the spring window is a massive win for coaches and roster stability. Previously, coaches had to navigate December worrying about recruiting, bowl prep, and an early portal window. They had to basically re-recruit their own recruits. The move to a single, consolidated window in January makes logistical sense. It allows the season to conclude before the full-scale chaos of player movement begins. Furthermore, it prevents the frustrating scenario of a player going through spring practice, getting a feel for their spot on the depth chart, and then immediately bolting, leaving a hole that's impossible to fill.

The problem that remains

However, this doesn't solve the root issue: a lack of commitment and the rampant tampering fueled by NIL collectives. We are seeing a system where wealthy collectives can essentially poach players year after year, encouraging them to enter the portal to the highest bidder. This isn't what the Transfer Portal was designed for.

What's the solution? We need more meaningful regulation. Maybe a player who transfers is required to stay at their new school for two seasons before being allowed to transfer again without penalty. Or maybe a "one free transfer every two years" rule.

Look, there are no easy answers, but the goal should be to preserve player movement while restoring a semblance of roster integrity. The current model, where a player can transfer multiple times without sitting out, is simply not sustainable for the long-term health of the sport. This new window is a good start, but the NCAA's work is far from over.

Drew Holbrook is an avid Kentucky fan who has been covering the Cats for over 10 years. In his free time he enjoyes downtime with his family and Premier League soccer.You can find him on X here.Micah 7:7. #UptheAlbion