The loss to Ole Miss was frustrating, but the real story of Kentucky football's current struggles may have been told after the final whistle. The post-game press conferences from Head Coach Mark Stoops and Offensive Coordinator Bush Hamdan painted a picture not of a unified front, but of a coaching staff plagued by conflicting messages, sideline chaos, and a head coach whose "hands-off" approach seems anything but.
An "inexcusable" mess of miscommunication

Both coaches were in agreement on one thing: the offensive operation in the first half was a disaster. Stoops was visibly angry when describing the situation that led to burning all three timeouts.
"Yeah, it was really inexcusable to be totally honest with you... Put it all together and it was messy," Stoops said. "It really pissed me off and we had a discussion with the offensive staff and got that rectified."
Hamdan, when asked about the same issue, pointed to a breakdown in process.
"It's obviously miscommunication from being upstairs in the booth to down there," Hamdan explained. "It's something we got to take a look at and go from there." Maybe possibly get on the sideline then?
While both acknowledge the problem, the framing is different. Stoops is furious about the "inexcusable" result, while Hamdan points to a systemic "miscommunication," a concerning admission for a second-year coordinator.
Stoops publicly pushes for a new quarterback

Perhaps the most telling moment came when Stoops was asked about the quarterback situation, especially with Zach Calzada's injury. The head coach did not hold back, making it clear he's looking for a change.
"Regardless of Zach’s status, do you have to consider a quarterback situation?" a reporter asked.
"Certainly, let’s just look at the way it is," Stoops responded. "I want to see Cutter and yeah, I want to see him, yes."
This wasn't a coach protecting his starter. It was a public declaration of his desire to see the freshman, Cutter Boley. This came after Stoops had already subtly criticized Calzada's performance, stating, "There were some throws that were there... I feel like our vision has to be better at quarterback and get the ball out of his hands."
The "zero-zero percent" interference contradiction

This is where all the pieces come together to challenge Stoops's long-held public stance. For years, he has insisted he is not involved in the offense. He repeated it again Saturday night.
"I just sat there and everybody thinks I control the offense or call plays, which I, zero-zero percent," Stoops claimed.
But how can a coach be "zero-zero percent" involved when, in the same press conference, he admits to:
- Getting "pissed off" at the offensive staff's operational failures and personally stepping in at halftime to get them "rectified"?
- Publicly campaigning for a specific quarterback to get more playing time over the current starter?
- Being on the headset with Hamdan and "second-guessing" the play-calling in real time?
The evidence from the coach's own mouth suggests a leader who is deeply, and perhaps increasingly, involved in an offense he is profoundly frustrated with. The conflicting messages and public pressures create a chaotic picture, suggesting the problems for Kentucky football run far deeper than a single loss. The same problem has been there for 13 years now. You be the judge on who it is.
With pressuring mounting and national analysts saying things like that "gets you fired", Stoops and Hamdan are trying to pass the buck.
Drew Holbrook is an avid Kentucky fan who has been covering the Cats for over 10 years. In his free time, he spends time with his family, and watching Premier League soccer. Psalm 121:7-8. #UpTheAlbion