Kentucky Wildcats vs. Indiana Hoosiers: to be continued?

Mar 23, 2012; Atlanta, GA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats head coach John Calipari (left) embraces Indiana Hoosiers head coach Tom Crean (right) following the game in the semifinals of the south region of the 2012 NCAA men

The Cats already have border rivals in Tennessee and imagined border rivalries between Cincinnati, Ohio State, and West Virginia. But you don’t see those schools begging to play UK annually. Indiana, on the contrary, needs UK more than we need them. Bob Knight is (has been) washed up and his days at IU have been numbered for well over a decade now.

In that decade since his departure, Kentucky has had more than enough wins against the Hoosiers to support the fact that Indiana only hurts UK’s schedule. Kentucky has a 10-3 record against the Hoosiers, with two of those losses coming in Bloomington since the teams ended play at neutral sites. And that is exactly to what the talks boil down to: neutral sites.

There had been talks for the past few seasons that the series would resume in neutral sites after the completion of the Yum! Center in Louisville, so the Cats would be able to play in Freedom Hall without problems. In Indianapolis, the Lucas Oil Stadium was also completed, giving both schools neutral sites in their respective states. But after Indiana’s rise to prominence and their victory over Kentucky, the home crowd in Bloomington is the only advantage they have left in their arsenal. Calipari’s recruiting is at a steady rate, compared to that of Crean’s, which has taken nearly four seasons to take off.

So the facts determine that the series helps Indiana more than Kentucky, as well as the ending of the series (presumably temporary) hurts Indiana more. Kentucky should schedule bigger names and more competition while they can, but with Indiana on the rise, would keeping them be a wiser decision? The ball is in your court, Tommy Boy.